Review: Google's Goggles are blind (for now, at least)

Google Goggles, released to much hype a few weeks ago, has the ability to allow users to simply snap a photo of something with their phone and return related search results in a standard Google results page.  Sadly, the real results are inaccurate or non-existent in far too many cases.  Google Goggles are supposed to make our search experience easier and allow for the unknown to become known just by looking at it.

The given example is someone who takes a picture of the Eiffel Tower, returning the Google search results in under a second.  Pretty nifty in theory.  The reality is that even though this example works, there is no convenience to this.  The Eiffel tower is an international icon and it is simply easier to type or speak into your Android device and get the results that you need.  If the user already knows what the item that they are looking at is, Goggles actually takes much longer.

Google Goggles would be of great use if it could recognize a plate of untouched food and return the recipe to you, or allow you to take a picture of a flower or tree and return the species, but the app comes right out and says it is weak in those areas.  How does being able to take a picture of a Coca-Cola can benefit me when it’s just easier to hit voice search and say “Coca-Cola”?  Expanding on the brand idea, I’ve taken photos of a specific model Whirlpool washing machine, including the model #, in a Goggles photo, only to receive a search result to the main Whirlpool site.  In my opinion, it should take me to user reviews, support pages, and best prices or specifications on the web for that particular model.

In addition, I’ve taken very clear photos of the Puma logo off of a sock, the New Balance “N” off of a shoe, the BMW logo off of a steering wheel, and a DOTS box of candy, and all have returned no results.  Is the database for Google Goggles not the the same as the Google images database?  If so, all of these would have been found, and if Google is creating a separate database for this app, they have quite a ways to go.

In it’s defense, Goggles is fantastic for scanning business cards, allowing you to add the results directly to your contacts, but this could have been a separate app and it surprises me that Google would have released Google Goggles in such an early and incomplete state to the public.

The bottom line is that Google has a fantastic idea on its hands.  If it can allow users to search for something they know nothing or little about based on a picture, the possibilities are endless.  But at this stage of its life, it only becomes a nuisance with inaccurate results – a mainly gimmick app used to show up your friends carrying non-Android devices.

Watch Michael’s video demo of Google Goggles that he shot when the app was first announced.

It is also worth noting that a new version of Google Goggles was released since this story was written, but that our preliminary test results show no significant recognition improvements.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

No Responses to “Review: Google's Goggles are blind (for now, at least)”

  1. cece says:

    It is admitted that not all kind of images are indexed yet.

    But I must admit that for some kind of images it works well.

    Book covers works very well (even for french books, and even with just a small part of the cover -ex: a small illustration-). (ok that is not always the most useful use case, since generally you have access to the book so you can read the title).

    I tried shooting pictures from a National Geographic calendar. A lot were recognized, and lead me either to this same calendar, or other utilizations of the very same shots (interesting !), or to websites of the photographers.

    Art (paintings) works very well too. ex : I could shot an illustration on a tea box, which was a small part of a painting, and it found the original painting and artist.

    I was also surprised that it worked with some other things such as my tv box (Freebox) remote control which was recognized, or a shot of my car dashboard (by night) which correctly lead me to Peugeot 206 related pages.

  2. Chuck Zich says:

    Wow, you are having much better luck then I have. For books I like using the app SnapTell, it works for CD’s and DVD’s too. It automatically brings you to reviews and trailers as well.

    For Art, I like PlinkArt, it pulls up a very nice synopsis of the artist and other relevant info.

    I understand that it is easier to use one app for everything, but when others do it better I stick with them.

    It’s odd how your dashboard shot worked but I took a picture of my steering wheel with the logo centered and it wouldn’t recognize it.

  3. [...] Shared Review: Google’s Goggles are blind (for now, at least):. [...]

  4. [...] you’re looking for and Google will do its best to try and find what you’re looking for. We weren’t too impressed with Google Goggles when it first came out, so let’s hope the Goggles elements in Google Shopper are tweaked. [...]

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: SharePoint.